PENROCK SEEDS AND PLANTS NEWSLETTER JANUARY AND FEBRUARY 2012. PART ONE. PART TWO.
|
|||
SUMMARY. Road reserves play a significant role during changes to the countryside by preserving narrow strips of habitat between the roads and adjacent farmland. Many plants thrive in these places freed from the habitat destruction or processes taking place in existing farmland. Certain plants are able to withstand considerable alterations to their habitats while others decline sharply to the point where they become locally extinct. Habitat changes are dynamic and beneficial for some species. Nearly all these changes are induced by different types of land use, put into place to serve the economic and recreational uses of the human dominated countryside. Habitat destruction is, in contrast, mostly an irreversible process unless agricultural lands are allowed to revert to their former state of bushveld or grassveld. A number of bulbous, caudiciform and succulent plants are iconic, epitomising not only the process of habitat changes but also the results. The two parts of this account focus on the subject in the eastern part of the North West Province (part one) and the north west section of Limpopo (part two). Very little flora is formally conserved in South Africa and where it is, the plant communities that are protected are in areas set aside for the protection of fauna. An understanding of the autecology of plants under conditions of different land use is indispensable for their long term preservation.
NEWSLETTER PART ONE. Other forms have fewer broader leaves and are quite widely recorded from various parts of northern South Africa particularly in Mpumalanga and Kwazulu Natal. Venter (1993: 132) refers to L. leptophylla with the spirally twisted leaves as the commoner form but the reverse was found during the current research. The broader leaved form was found to be much more widespread and usually numerous where found. The plants with fine spirally twisted leaves are mainly sparse and infrequent where found, occurring singly or in widely scattered small groups. It may well be that the concept of L. leptophylla needs to be redefined and if this happens the anomalies and variations currently under this species can be better accounted for. Perhaps some of the variation can be accommodated under the concept of subspecies and in other instances we may be dealing with different entities altogether. The broad and narrow leaved forms of L. leptophylla are often separated geographically. The broader leaved plants are usually found in short grassland in hilly or mountainous areas, frequently in mist belt escarpment regions. The finer leaved form is generally associated with arid mainly deciduous woodland. This is not always the case. In one instance plants that can currently be assigned to the broad leaved form are found growing in loamy soil in combretum woodland, only a few kilometres away from the narrow leaved form that grows in sandy soil in mixed deciduous woodland.
THE FINE LEAVED FORM OF L. LEPTOPHYLLA NORTH OF BRITS AND PRETORIA.
L. LEPTOPHYLLA NORTH OF PRETORIA. The tall burkea trees have mostly been chopped down and little of the original habitat remains. There has also been an invasion of indigenous Sickle bush Dichrostachys cinerea in the places were there was open burkea woodland. Several visits were made over the past decade to search for L. leptophylla in the places where there were formerly burkea trees. Each time fewer and fewer were found until a visit in January 2011 when none were seen at all. The ledebourias have also disappeared from the short grassland. There are several reasons for this which seem to have worked in combination. Sand was removed from the area for building purposes, leaving behind shallow pans which filled with water during the rainy season. In addition agricultural lands have been established in places where the ledebourias used to grow. The high summer rainfall coupled with habitat disturbance over the last few years has turned what used to be short seasonally moist grassland into large seepage areas. These are too wet for the ledebourias and many bulbs have probably rotted. A few L. leptophylla are still found in declining numbers in the combretum veld which is in the process of degradation. Building sand is removed from several places, agricultural lands are also being established and there is widespread dumping of domestic rubbish and building rubble. An important photographic record, prior to widespread degradation of the habitat, was provided by environmental journalist Carol Knoll. She took extensive habitat photographs of the grassland locality in December 2004. Some of these were published in Veld and Flora, the journal of the Botanical Society of South Africa (Craib September 2005: 126, 128 – 129). At this time I thought that the L. leptophylla may have been an undescribed species and it is incorrectly referred to as such in the caption to the photograph on page 129. It is interesting to see how local extinctions take place. In this case the L. leptophylla have mostly disappeared from two of the three habitat niches where they once occurred. They are steadily declining in the combretum veld and can be expected to disappear from here too as habitat degradation continues.
L. LEPTOPHYLLA NORTH OF BRITS. The habitat is in the initial stages of degradation. Trees are being felled and some domestic refuse and building rubble dumped in the area. The numbers of L. leptophylla are much smaller here than they were near Tshwaing and probably likely to disappear more quickly as full scale habitat degradation gets under way. The ledebourias are curiously absent from a lot of what should be ideal habitat. This is not readily explained and requires additional research. A few kilometres to the north of Letlhabile is the settlement of Maboloko. Immediately to the west the broad leaved form of L. leptophylla used to be well represented. Much of the habitat has been destroyed by the establishment of a huge sand quarry and also the dumping of refuse and building rubble. This is a pity since these plants provided a unique opportunity to study what appears to be a form of L. leptophylla growing close to the typical fine leaved plants.
THE GROWTH CYCLE. The ledebourias in the two study areas have always produced relatively small amounts of seed, from one season to the next. The paucity of seeds is likely to explain the overall rarity of the plants in the places where they are found. Seeds germinate around the parent plants which accounts for the habit the bulbs have of occurring in small groups. Some of these consist of bulbs growing so tightly together that they give the appearance of being a single large plant. The bulbs enter dormancy between early March and late April depending on the quality of the late summer rains. In the second half of summer the leaves are often completely eaten down by lepidopterous larvae and, if this occurs, they do not usually resprout that season. This is important to note since if the plants are ever surveyed this should be done in November when they are at their easiest to find and well before they may be eaten by caterpillars.
PROCESSES IN THE ENVIRONMENT. The alteration of the habitats through and removal of sand, the dumping of rubble and the establishment of agricultural lands degrades the quality of fires with the result that some places escape burning altogether for several years in succession. This is exacerbated as at both localities the veld is criss-crossed with tracks which further reduces the general spread of dry season fires. Livestock, mostly cattle and donkeys, is kept in both areas where the L. leptophylla have been studied. In general there is little effect on the plants as they occur in small groups over a wide area and quite often grow in the protection of thorny shrubs. Fine leaves are also less readily damaged by trampling than broad leaves.
LEDEBOURIA VISCOSA. Venter (1993: 79) placed L. viscosa in the Section Humerati of the Genus Ledebouria and within this group in the subsection Erectifoliae (1993: 120). He considered that the species was related to Ledebouria atrobrunnea and Ledebouria dolomiticola but did not specify reasons for this. Erect foliage is not a constant character of L. viscosa and there are probably more differences between this species and the two others at the level of general morphology and autecology than there are similarities. It is probably more realistic to accommodate L. viscosa in a section of the Genus on its own rather than to group it with other species. L. viscosa was only known from three herbarium records at the time Venter published his revision of the Genus Ledebouria. Two records were from the farms Buffelshoek and Waterval east of Thabazimbi and the other from the sandy plains west of Kransberg, a peak at the north western end of the Waterberg. Subsequently the species was found in similar sandy countryside in the eastern part of the farm Hoopdal some ten kilometres east of the Matlabas River. This record extended the distribution of the species well north of Thabazimbi (Craib and Brown 1998: 49 – 53). Some years later I found the species again much further north on the farm Fourieskloof close to Afguns. This is cattle ranching and game farming country close to the town of Lephalele. The plants at this locality were also growing in coarse gravely sand similar to the conditions encountered east of the Matlabas River. This extraordinary jump in the plant’s distribution suggests that it is probably not a narrow endemic round Thabazimbi as originally thought. It probably occurs sparingly over a wide area from at least Thabazimbi to Afguns and Kuipersbult. It is clear that the species is very sparingly distributed and absent from a good deal of sandy areas that seem ideally suited to its requirements. They are such distinctive plants that they cannot be overlooked by anyone with an interest in the local flora. Farmers who may read this paper are encouraged to report records of this species when they come across it, to the herbarium at the National Biodiversity Institute in Pretoria.
HABITAT CHANGES. Most of the farms that existed before the creation of the park were used for cattle ranching. There appear to be no published records of L. viscosa from what is now the park, except from Hoopdal. This farm is now part of its north western boundary. Marakele contains a vast amount of habitat suited to this plant and there is little doubt that it occurs protected in the park in good numbers.
L. VISCOSA ALONG THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY OF THE PARK. Unfortunately no data was collected relating to plants growing in the reserve of the road that then formed the northern boundary of the farm Hoopdal. This road is now the north western boundary of the Marakele Park. Thus I am unable to compare the modern situation with the plants in the road reserve of the park to what existed before. Soon after the electrified fence along the boundary of the park was erected the road reserve was mechanically mowed annually during the dry season. This is at a time when the L. viscosa bulbs have already entered dormancy. During this process the sand is moved around and it was initially thought that this would damage the more shallow rooted ledebourias. A survey of parts of the road reserve was done on 21 December 2011 after good rains had fallen in the previous weeks. The L. viscosa were found to be relatively numerous in the road reserve with a few seedling plants in the immediate vicinity of the adults. It was clear that the annual mowing of the grass had benefited the bulbs and that regeneration from seed had been optimal. The absence of grazing animals, and the trampling associated with them, meant that many of the plants had the chance to flower and set seed. The road reserve habitat along the boundary of the park has a permanent status since it is highly unlikely that the boundary fence will ever be removed. This is unlike many other parts of South Africa where road reserve fences are regularly removed and the flora in them dwindling to the point of extinction. The road reserve along the boundary of Marakele is clearly an artificial habitat. This is true not only at the level of processes in the environment such as grazing and fire cycles, but also in the long term preservation of the altered status of this environment.
THE LOCALITY NEAR AFGUNS. The woodland at this locality is mainly deciduous and not nearly as open as that encountered east of the Matlabas River. Most of the L. viscosa grow in dappled shade throughout their summer growing season. There is also far less grass cover than there is at the other locality and many of the ledebourias are found growing amongst leaf litter rather than grass. The livestock grazes mostly in the grassy abandoned lands that are reverting to bush and in grassy patches that occur sparingly amongst the bush. The consequence is that trampling of the bulbs, when they are in leaf, is confined mostly to areas where livestock is in transit to the few grassy places where they graze. There is favourable regeneration from seed mostly in areas where there is an absence of grass or where the plants grow under shrubs.
The L. viscosa are as plentiful, relatively speaking, in shaded places, which comprises the bulk of the habitat, as they are on the grassy strip below the pylons. This supports the data from the other localities where the species is found predominantly in woodland but also in open grassy areas that are met with between places where there are shrubs and trees. No L. viscosa were found growing in the old agricultural lands. The succession of vegetation that normally occurs on disturbed ground is probably too dense for plants to colonise these sites. It may be that, with the very specific environmental requirements that these bulbs have, they will only start to appear, if indeed they do, once the habitat has been allowed to revert to its former state. All the L. viscosa habitat known so far is found in areas used for cattle ranching, game farms and in one instance a national park where the animals that used to occur have been introduced again. There are no communally owned herds and rural villages anywhere. It is probable that this form of land use is inimical to L. viscosa, which seems to have the lowest and slowest reproductive output amongst all the ledebouria species.
THE GROWTH CYCLE. Many ledebourias in a population fail to flower in a given season of adequate rainfall and during droughts nearly all the plants produce only leaves. Flower stems are readily trampled by game and livestock reducing the chances for successful seed production even further. The seeds produced by this species are amongst the largest in the Genus. Typically they are about 7 mm long and 5 mm wide when freshly set. They shrivel somewhat after a few days, a habit typical of all ledebouria species. Most seeds lodge in sand immediately around the parent plants. They may sometimes get washed further away in runoff after every heavy rainfall. The seed distribution pattern explains the occurrence of adult plants in the habitat growing mostly in small groups or more rarely as individual plants. Very little is known about L. viscosa and a good deal more needs to be learnt about its distribution. It is a unique species, a curiosity in the genus whose affinities remain obscure.
PHOTOGRAPHING AND PAINTING L. LEPTOPHYLLA AND L. VISCOSA. Both artist and photographer immerse themselves in their work, making a unique and special contribution to the book on habitat changes.
REFERENCES AND FURTHER READING.
|